From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 18F7B3858404; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 18:45:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 18F7B3858404
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687632300;
	bh=6NaAB8dcbLj3dCRqlhUGmtQZf7SyREEvjXRFyezAQ/Q=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aNHIAtst4H4WMGnu1nN57/52N4KJrY6lAEXeE/MSY0+yZCJso1KLcESWLtZNYb0Qx
	 hOzuK2XXcFEsp2+MlIVOUPGO80njcgdJ2369O2nLy/9U3J2adXMcza0AWQ5XwS+PnY
	 lxa/y4hgsx5kyhUupJ3dYBNWcquSksO7wAOwW5KU=
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of
 parametrized derived type
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 18:44:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-82943-4-XzoIZV7Pgg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-82943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-82943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82943

Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Westbrooks from comment #13)
> I sent in the patch to those emails. Hopefully now the ball will start
> rolling and I can slowly get this packaged into a legitimate fix. I'll po=
st
> updates here as I receive them.
>=20
> The patch is below, if you would like to try it. I did this in the GCC 14
> code.
>=20
I saw your email. Thanks for getting involved!=