From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C52A73858002; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:48:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C52A73858002
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679323693;
	bh=SM07+OUYvw6m3xuVRLA4onv9Pvdpaer7CAttEQkh7yk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eYZICfq4ywu7KltTXWpukBzc/vevjFzzXzpBYPO6G0hN4N9mhZAG/4A308vy0GEYh
	 ArTuY1TszxuPYjVFdKa1fVRt1VjXiE6Lgbtm7M5DMxhlqyk+tKvV91r5ej3q3uHndX
	 FGfcJdngOsywAzECBMnf3M5CXtLe+r5N8iJ4l3DI=
From: "vegard.g.j at icloud dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of
 parametrized derived type
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:48:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vegard.g.j at icloud dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-82943-4-gJHH8IYzd7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-82943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-82943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82943

vegard <vegard.g.j at icloud dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vegard.g.j at icloud dot c=
om

--- Comment #10 from vegard <vegard.g.j at icloud dot com> ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #9)
> (In reply to alig from comment #8)
> > The problem still persists with GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.0.
>=20
> The problem is likely to persist for the foreseeable future
> as there is no one left to work on gfortran bugs.  Lacking=20
> a sudden influx of new volunteer contributors, it seems
> the only way forward is to NOT use parameterized derived=20
> types with gfortran.

Any news here? I seem to be having this issue with gfortran (Homebrew GCC)
12.2.0

As a side note: I'm somewhat new to the fortran community, but could see my=
self
contributing to gfortran in the future. Do you think you could point me to
where I should read up on contributing?=