public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/83476] [8/9/10 Regression] Template argument deduction fails with reference template parameter
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:09:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-83476-4-ig6efObLqd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-83476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83476

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:904cbf6ae2a1e45b3a272365cca19f9dd9a27fa2

commit r10-9733-g904cbf6ae2a1e45b3a272365cca19f9dd9a27fa2
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 20 12:06:24 2021 -0400

    c++: Fix deduction with reference NTTP [PR83476]

    In the testcase ref11.C below, during deduction for the call f(a),
    uses_deducible_template_parms returns false for the dependent
    specialization A<V> because the generic template argument V here is
    wrapped in an implicit INDIRECT_REF (formed from template_parm_to_arg).
    Since uses_deducible_template_parms returns false, unify_one_argument
    exits early without ever attempting to deduce 'n' for 'V'.  This patch
    fixes this by making deducible_expression look through such implicit
    INDIRECT_REFs.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/83476
            PR c++/99885
            * pt.c (deducible_expression): Look through implicit
            INDIRECT_REFs as well.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/83476
            PR c++/99885
            * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction85.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/template/ref11.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 2ccc05a5141506fde0e20dec702c717fd67bf6ee)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-83476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-13 20:04 ` [Bug c++/83476] [8/9/10/11 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 20:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 12:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 15:51 ` [Bug c++/83476] [8/9/10 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 16:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-04-30  7:43 ` [Bug c++/83476] [8/9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14  9:49 ` [Bug c++/83476] [9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 19:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-11 14:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-11 15:01 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-83476-4-ig6efObLqd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).