public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/83705] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
       [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-29 10:10 ` m.diehl at mpie dot de
  2021-05-14  9:49 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: m.diehl at mpie dot de @ 2020-03-29 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705

Martin Diehl <m.diehl at mpie dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |m.diehl at mpie dot de

--- Comment #15 from Martin Diehl <m.diehl at mpie dot de> ---
Just as an addon: Compiling the following code


program integer_conversion                                                      

  implicit none                                                                 
  integer :: i                                                                  

  i = 5                                                                         
  print*, 'b'//repeat('a',i)                                                    

end program integer_conversion

with 
-Wconversion-extra

gives the message
Warning: Conversion from INTEGER(4) to INTEGER(8) at (1) [-Wconversion-extra]

This warning is of course not really a problem, but since it is related to the
handling of the NCOPIES argument of repeat it might be related to this bug.
I'm using gfortran 9.3.0.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/83705] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
       [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-03-29 10:10 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284 m.diehl at mpie dot de
@ 2021-05-14  9:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-01  8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|8.5                         |9.4

--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/83705] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
       [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-03-29 10:10 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284 m.diehl at mpie dot de
  2021-05-14  9:49 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01  8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-27  9:37 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01  8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|9.4                         |9.5

--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/83705] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
       [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-01  8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27  9:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-01-29  4:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|9.5                         |10.4

--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/83705] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
       [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-05-27  9:37 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-01-29  4:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|10.4                        |10.5

--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/83705] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284
       [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-29  4:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-29  4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705

Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
                 CC|                            |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As far as I can tell this is fixed on branches 10 thru 13.  I do not know why
it was reopened.  I am closing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-29  4:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-83705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-29 10:10 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284 m.diehl at mpie dot de
2021-05-14  9:49 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:37 ` [Bug fortran/83705] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-29  4:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).