From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C7E5B3938C23; Fri, 1 May 2020 19:01:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C7E5B3938C23 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588359706; bh=WDj+Fkij9pAA3xQvNnnniyC1hx31Fi84R3n8fqoqFBM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fEzjgur7HQ6ofyNAjE/2l2jYYkRKZBHMVR1UN737IRE/UiuRkMaVZxo5rj+3mcQ3F FEFfmQkxwKRXTbwMKZAeDZWDaU8Fj+5kZCW/4Kmo4Uwnpxy0YoR0UV7TEgbpQoeQe8 1rWx8rLkvN8HnpZjH279tBmL4+TPvs8YATuAhBt4= From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/83733] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on bounded integer when inlining Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 19:01:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 19:01:46 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D83733 Martin Sebor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2018-01-08 00:00:00 |2020-5-1 Known to fail|9.1.0 |9.2.0 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Reconfirming with GCC 10.=