From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BEFF23877023; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BEFF23877023 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584030370; bh=VsFyfGpHMyc9xpgiSdkekxf5iwUFLgU6oy3rtmq5m3c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lLGEozlQO4EmfxPBEe2opmx62RgOSA4rfkTYm0luQnLdcJGNZ8+du7hY1qyVdzsep z1b9FIdAUGEHoJolQWaw+qP9uL/MsXxuRZOOI8ItTQcrhrO+F/9ssw6iVLOFp20CzT BbcdFWbhjV+KPW8Qjuy0rKIxXqHUe6huoBPoc/QQ= From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/83935] DWARF for a variant part is incorrect Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: derodat at adacore dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D83935 Tom Tromey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #11 from Tom Tromey --- I'm fully on board with the GCC approach here, and I think this is something that should be changed in the DWARF standard. And, there's a DWARF bug for it. And finally, I have some patches to teach gdb to understand the GCC output here. So, I'm closing this as invalid.=