From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A675D385DC2E; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:58:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A675D385DC2E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1598435906; bh=FJOvwA5/De82W6fHrNJAsb3uGKxFnPDrnFkroiJC6/A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HgLnMtct+eSGP78aSp6MxKp1ZkBxzoVEBm64LLg051hjD/aINDxDAWZqftSELi/SB pTH2U3Q6toUUk6BgswycJjCPCHndnPAiQEB7OJBU8tEOaA+Bdd1mBW8lTUFJ8mZcN9 i39dD6YWDdYpah2zGkWnMOk0gPPof5QsNvJ0YBjk= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/84026] invalid 'unnamed scoped enum is not allowed' when scoped enum has a full qualified-id Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:58:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:58:26 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84026 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed testcase (so it doesn't define S1::E1 twice): struct S1 { enum class E1; }; enum class S1::E1 {}; // OK struct S2 { enum class E2; }; enum class ::S2::E2 {}; // Not OK=