From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 717D63945C27; Fri,  7 Jul 2023 10:33:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 717D63945C27
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688725990;
	bh=p6+ptrv1E79J+NBa0fQoClaTPJav8UaWQ2CDoBJWaKw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=q4dXUZVUMpZeaUCfhuStl1R9DFezCtjOrpRDa0Ai4lc0EfliyuFMuN+FSqeyCB8PF
	 gVct7X1I+wWqQpjl4of65bMFiV3WzCiIHQQG/em/D/20k39zrJUegVGA7I+Ithu3Fv
	 zYs0FxtLwF+SnqoivYxvNHHcmfw6bGBHjtgOVeUY=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/84251] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Performance regression
 in gcc 8/9/10/11/12 when comparing floating point numbers
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 10:33:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-84251-4-cbj2MK8s3E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-84251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-84251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84251

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|10.5                        |11.5

--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.=