public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer
       [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-04-21 16:48 ` martin.ankerl at gmail dot com
  2021-04-21 20:35 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: martin.ankerl at gmail dot com @ 2021-04-21 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476

Martin Ankerl <martin.ankerl at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |martin.ankerl at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Martin Ankerl <martin.ankerl at gmail dot com> ---
I just "discovered" this bug as well. The warning works correctly in g++ 6.4,
but starting from 7.1 upwards it does not work any more.

My reproducer which is very similar: 

struct Foo {
        [[nodiscard]] virtual bool foo() { return true; };
    virtual ~Foo() = default;
};


void shouldEmitWarning() {
    auto* f = new Foo();
    f->foo(); // <-- why no warning here?
    delete f;
}

Godbolt link: https://godbolt.org/z/xqaPrshYn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer
       [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-04-21 16:48 ` [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer martin.ankerl at gmail dot com
@ 2021-04-21 20:35 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-02 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-21 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |10.2.0, 11.0, 8.3.0, 9.2.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-04-21
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with GCC 11 and test case in comment #1.  Attribute
warn_unused_result does the right thing here.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer
       [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-04-21 16:48 ` [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer martin.ankerl at gmail dot com
  2021-04-21 20:35 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-02 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-02 10:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-02 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Ankerl from comment #1)
> I just "discovered" this bug as well. The warning works correctly in g++
> 6.4, but starting from 7.1 upwards it does not work any more.

No, I don't think that's true, this never worked. The warning for gcc 6 is
telling you that it doesn't understand the [[nodiscard]] attribute. You would
get the same warning for [[lolwut]].

GCC 7 does understand the attribute, so that -Wattributes warning is gone, but
the expected warning about the unused result is missing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer
       [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-02 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-02 10:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-02 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-04 23:28 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-02 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 97712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer
       [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-02 10:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-02 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-04 23:28 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-02 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2021-04-21 00:00:00         |2021-6-2

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In PR 97712 Jakub said:

[[nodiscard]] is a function attribute rather than function type attribute, so
it really doesn't apply to virtual calls (unless it can be devirtualized
early).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer
       [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-02 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-04 23:28 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-04 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476

--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The same problem applies to attribute noreturn (but not deprecated).  Clang,
ICC, and Visual C++ behave as expected in both cases, suggesting GCC should
change.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-04 23:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-84476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-21 16:48 ` [Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer martin.ankerl at gmail dot com
2021-04-21 20:35 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02 10:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02 10:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-04 23:28 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).