From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D0D853858D35; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:52:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0D853858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596138750;
 bh=mLCEqMkF9uVJoEnvh5WYgO/cvF2D9f79eq9f2L6jOB8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=hrFx/LDSbZ8Ob3rcsFLzy4b54p8/+jwurn8PQhI6NZfUGYtWOptxtl2/aLE5zF0t8
 J/huSeDq0Sy1lc3Aafi7ayp/Qyhs7w8+8DMaOry6b5v2tGUFCqFBn94ra4PvWL+zjU
 HWuX+a9rzS9ITD1mTUg8/Q79DKa/wh8P8pNZUUv8=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/84490] [8/9/10/11 regression] 436.cactusADM regressed by
 6-8% percent with -Ofast on Zen and Haswell, compared to gcc 7.2
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:52:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-84490-4-vMfOvwMnl8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-84490-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-84490-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:52:30 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84490

--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The problem sometimes is still there, sometimes it isn't:

https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D37.100.0&plot.1=
=3D27.100.0&

I wonder whether we should keep this bug opened, the benchmark seems too
erratic.=