* [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range
[not found] <bug-84577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-07 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.0 |10.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range
[not found] <bug-84577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 11:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.2 |10.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range
[not found] <bug-84577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 11:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 20:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-08 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.3 |10.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range
[not found] <bug-84577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-17 20:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-17 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.2.0, 12.0
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No changed in GCC 12 but I'm no longer working on this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range
[not found] <bug-84577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-17 20:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range
[not found] <bug-84577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 7:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread