From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 151CD39484AE; Tue, 12 May 2020 08:47:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 151CD39484AE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589273242; bh=DATlxjfoI5D/twrlPMzQ0Fu/VQGjCRVh1nyNJdHzE0I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nnU12wmjg8uzge8MqzdzlXNie4Wn0AQ4gx6VjOi8ElljAJMyrOYckSCKo6IgdkK3S f5Z9LqIWKkfBj86KEykGAONYQmTpA11bSMzuVteBy+aOxavS1ckJdlz5AV9ACRhkP/ R0eNwXORAaIF0fgiPlS8zwd7W9qAGEeKhDjH2kX8= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/84766] __verbose_terminate_handler mistakes parallel unhandled exceptions for recursive std::terminate() calls Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 08:47:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 08:47:22 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84766 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think we want to use another TLS entry just for this handler, so I'm leaning towards the nice suggestion to say "reentrant" instead.=