From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DE39D3858C5F; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:20:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE39D3858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1720855221;
	bh=IDIgK2kcz4dbHg6u6ROIWrhHJhCoqiKLqSppc8YdqLo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=C4VYwzlkcrBM3UP4sY8fhhhAMbqZcChUCcMRygN6xt4z0qmbe7QSkdNWWNBHHsAIq
	 dVnTIsrmYCNSlhpsGw13FWzAo8GlHRx1GTCPIIImq7DJXw2DrBcPe2fZKBx9kOEHZw
	 wSNoWXYieNgFCZeebf2uo4yoPcXF0CFIsrKIZnc0=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/84868] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in
 gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:20:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-84868-4-92LRaPgAbH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-84868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-84868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84868

--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> Created attachment 58641 [details]
> Fix for this PR
>=20
> The only way that I have found to fix this is to simplify the len_trim
> expression. In doing so, another parameter has to be created for which I
> have taken a leaf out of the unique_name mechanism. Unfortunately, two su=
ch
> parameters are created (parsing specification expression and then
> resolution), the first one of which is unused. I don't see any easy way to
> eliminate it.
>=20
> I came across another bug in testing variants, which is also fixed. Regte=
sts
> OK.
>=20
> I'll think further about doubling up on the parameter before submitting.
>=20
> Paul

I have figured out how to eliminate the duplicate parameter. I will be
submitting to the list very soon :-)

Cheers

Paul=