* [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics
[not found] <bug-84889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-07 23:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-07 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.0 |10.2
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics
[not found] <bug-84889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 11:56 ` [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-07 23:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-07 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #19)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> > @David: Can we close this now?
>
> I'm guessing he's probably waiting for his static analyzer to be merged;
> that patch series looked like it had some stuff relevant to this bug in it
ok, the static analyzer has been merged... so, David, can we close this now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics
[not found] <bug-84889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 11:56 ` [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-07 23:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.2 |10.3
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics
[not found] <bug-84889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 12:41 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dave, should we unset the milestone? Any further changes will only happen on
trunk not the gcc-10 branch, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics
[not found] <bug-84889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 12:41 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.3 |---
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #24 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Clearing the milestone field. I think the only remaining things are (still):
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> [...]
> > * the diagnostic and the followup notes are grouped, so it's easier to pick
> > out what messages relate to what
> [...]
> > IIRC, clang does something where the left-hand column is only non-empty for
> > the start of a diagnostic; followup lines (e.g. due to line wrapping) are
> > indented by 1 char, so that the "wall of text" is broken up somewhat
> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics
[not found] <bug-84889-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 12:41 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-04 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread