From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 25F873850404; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:41:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 25F873850404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595508065; bh=CZ0ZWDJkeMPjnyWCw+zvRigC3NK5QX6ucxPDgS3JyRA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LCfMqALy6EO3Gy9WBn6QG/pndDPfF+x9ygGUFRxhd/v+mcDCvBiKQUP6ATRNVTxpE jU9DdKSNofOkg+/4ickdHCndSWKt8p2UPKhG/US66cBXQmBq3dGvDpWjy9JN/d6jSN mpCGIgZ0uhyFnoVswc2MBT12UEvEuwDMXVFFPvZI= From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:41:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:41:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84889 David Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|10.3 |--- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #24 from David Malcolm --- Clearing the milestone field. I think the only remaining things are (still= ): > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0) > [...] > > * the diagnostic and the followup notes are grouped, so it's easier to = pick > > out what messages relate to what > [...] > > IIRC, clang does something where the left-hand column is only non-empty= for > > the start of a diagnostic; followup lines (e.g. due to line wrapping) a= re > > indented by 1 char, so that the "wall of text" is broken up somewhat > [...]=