From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C1F6B3982E18; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:36:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1F6B3982E18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1590143808; bh=SnlEAnCOGPYxAmat3Tq56gBphNjlMJfP24HomNhKtx8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=A2AAfmXX9y2QyQz81JBxJRfRPHSj9IKQEKezvzL3rZXBQRH3AsDjizs3w8H8jI9l0 85eBocJGhJDsoqpNIOm1xOwGPWkqTb0jpNqauOinQZ8eC4q4sc+3U4txBH8zG68HVN xBcQgNyNX2Nwk2lxoAxXWoQpnr0M00qB6T3NEpbY= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/85282] CWG 727 (full specialization in non-namespace scope) Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:36:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:36:49 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D85282 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Compare to e.g. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1825 which says "[Moved to DR at the November, 2016 meeting.]" That means it's a retroactive fix for previous standards. That isn't the case for 727.=