From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EB6543858C1F; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:46:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EB6543858C1F From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/85487] Support '#pragma region' and '#pragma endregion' to allow code folding with Visual Studio Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:46:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easyhack X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:46:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D85487 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12) > Jeff said at the end of the thread that he wouldn't mind > if someone else approves it, so it's probably worth posting > again. OK, will do. I think Jeff's desire for a framework to ignore arbitrary pragmas might be nice, but nobody's going to do that, and this small improvement has a worki= ng patch. We shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. > The patch LGTM FWIW: only (very) minor comment is that > the unused argument name in handle_pragma_region can be dropped. Yeah, that was consistent with the rest of the file, but I already changed = the rest in r12-7282-g73a118c209fcbb so I'd update my patch in the same way. I'll also update it to ignore the very similar Xcode pragmas described in PR 61593. > I think the patch would need to wait for GCC 13 now though. Indeed.=