[Bug fortran/85547] Run-time error: character array constructor

[Bug fortran/85547] Run-time error: character array constructor

[anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The trim() and string concatenation are not even needed to see the string
length getting lost.

Example:

program p
  implicit none
  character(10) :: path = 'xyz/'
  print *, len      ( [ character(16) :: path ] ) ! ok
  call print_string ( [ character(16) :: path ] ) ! typespec lost
contains
  subroutine print_string (s)
    character(*), intent(in) :: s(:)
    print *, len(s), len(s)==16
  end subroutine
end program

prints:

          16
          10 F

Inspection of the tree-dump shows that the temporary creation for the
subroutine call looks like we initially have the proper string length
after the array constructor

    atmp.6.dtype = {.elem_len=16, .rank=1, .type=6};
    atmp.6.dim[0].stride = 1;
    atmp.6.dim[0].lbound = 0;
    atmp.6.dim[0].ubound = 0;
    atmp.6.span = 16;

which gets copied to the temporary

    atmp.9.dtype = {.elem_len=10, .rank=1, .type=6};
    atmp.9.dim[0].stride = 1;
    atmp.9.dim[0].lbound = 0;
    atmp.9.dim[0].ubound = 0;
    atmp.9.span = 10;

I wonder where we get this from.

Besides, we actually create two temporaries in succession instead of just
one...

[Bug fortran/85547] Run-time error: character array constructor

[anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mailling-lists-bd at posteo dot de

--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 111304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***