From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 908533858C20; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:20:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 908533858C20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664486424;
	bh=Eh7YzKlFPmYVGBjk+LC50nCm8k5soP7j/YCZwsNtuKs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jLcwVCILpmJa55yt274cWpfX60iuN31HVpSNnIu7Z66QZF8vOPNeZSlAx0CvfBy2Z
	 JyDZbcGdxJzkEqB+DpqFsaRJX3GM7IiZ154k5y9s3tZWf9HlXc0Ak3zwoF8nXU+nEz
	 GUeYlMn0MXeF5zWmot4rAkeGt8TW/X5H0besAE58=
From: "hiraditya at msn dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/85611] Suboptimal code generation for
 (potentially) redundant atomic loads
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:20:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hiraditya at msn dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-85611-4-1peCJ1XujP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-85611-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-85611-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D85611

AK <hiraditya at msn dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from AK <hiraditya at msn dot com> ---
Don't remember what I was expecting.=