public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated [not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2021-02-10 21:20 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-10 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010 --- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Should this be resolved as fixed per comment #10? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated [not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-02-10 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com 2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: law at redhat dot com @ 2021-02-15 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- I believe it's still an issue for gcc-8 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated [not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-02-10 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com @ 2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-04 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated [not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|8.5 |9.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The GCC 8 branch is being closed, fixed in GCC 9.1. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-14 10:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-10 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).