public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/86050] Inline break tail-call optimization [not found] <bug-86050-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2021-08-10 18:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-10 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86050 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- In the case of removing the noinline, GCC 10+ is able to tail call this function just fine and we don't get an overall stack increase. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-08-10 18:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <bug-86050-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-08-10 18:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86050] Inline break tail-call optimization pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).