public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "phosit at autistici dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/86072] Poor codegen with atomics
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 20:30:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-86072-4-00u3cIBUN7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-86072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86072

Phosit <phosit at autistici dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |phosit at autistici dot org

--- Comment #4 from Phosit <phosit at autistici dot org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Somebody has to decide if it's worth optimizing them and has to sit down and
> exactly specify what kind of optimizations are valid.
There is a paper about the optimization of atomics. It might not be detailed
enough.
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4455.html
Note that the memory-model changed a bit since the release of that paper.

> I guess it's worth optimizing them if these cases appear in real-world code
> (and then we'd like to see examples).
std::shared_ptr use fetch_add and fetch_sub. When a std::shared_ptr is not used
for syncronization this optimization could take effect.
PR 48987 is specifically about combining multiple fetch_add and fetch_sub.

           reply	other threads:[~2023-12-22 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <bug-86072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-86072-4-00u3cIBUN7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).