From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DEF22385841B; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:07:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DEF22385841B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686427632;
	bh=4mNh9wO7I+A33XrDpEccQ6Fo4g/Hql+dXuQqB7msXk8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=woebjjcsxXWCCwn8ao3nYyPmEnmNcfvET0pdFLic0YyJBjLF/EDwOQbN8gMZATSuy
	 jLeCmSUie2MMrvG2EgiCpd5Q/uYlNTfOd26wDWXccaCnCxvMlYlAg4vcosEiyI6Knd
	 bzTmaW93tP/9H3veS56egcVoO2cRI1xnUDuqzjpY=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/86277] Presence of optional arguments not recognized
 for zero length arrays
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:07:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-86277-4-0REv71iGnN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-86277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-86277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86277

--- Comment #17 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looking further at the implementation of gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage, =
the
size vs elem_size dance can be removed from my patch, as size is almost unu=
sed
in the onstack case.=