From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9D427385841B; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:17:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9D427385841B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686428258;
	bh=4Y970n7wEOUbOulCuX57M5QJ1gBMaG2586qiJlyKZhw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XKIb+rtMPn5A43paJx2rZ9Hb/OLGUElv3WRKjDCL4QsnVwZBMJHT5Ij6UGonjprY6
	 oOPG6ANpXTU3WXOK1Y2nY097+A2gTIQgT5OjOZ85/G9t6F54OY3pgZLxQLrIau38qZ
	 yOFISCfb8pI6EdiDBLr2fPEyh4OSxMP2jsgqheNg=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/86277] Presence of optional arguments not recognized
 for zero length arrays
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:17:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-86277-4-xJOETEBDkK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-86277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-86277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86277

Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #55296|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #18 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55300
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55300&action=3Dedit
Alternative patch v2

(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #17)
> Looking further at the implementation of gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage,
> the size vs elem_size dance can be removed from my patch, as size is almo=
st
> unused in the onstack case.

Updated patch attached.=