From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113640 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2018 10:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113589 invoked by uid 55); 6 Jul 2018 10:39:05 -0000 From: "richard.earnshaw at arm dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: richard.earnshaw at arm dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86383 --- Comment #3 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com --- On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 04.07.2018 20:55, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86383 >> >> --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- >> I'm not sure how relevant the netbsd-elf port is these days. I believe = they've >> now moved onto an EABI based ABI. But no GCC port of that has been >> contributed. >> >=20 > NetBSD switched on newer ARM CPUs to EABI and keeps compat with OABI. A > user is free to build either EABI and OABI for ARMv4+ CPUs. Older pre > ARMv4 CPUs use OABI only. >=20 GCC-9 will drop support for pre-armv4 CPUs. Such support has been marked as deprecated for about 3 years now. >>From gcc-bugs-return-609327-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 06 10:45:57 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118863 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2018 10:45:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118397 invoked by uid 55); 6 Jul 2018 10:45:35 -0000 From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode. Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2 Content-length: 480 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84711 --- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina --- Author: tnfchris Date: Fri Jul 6 10:44:35 2018 New Revision: 262472 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=3D262472&root=3Dgcc&view=3Drev Log: Require sse for testcase on i686. PR target/84711 * gcc.dg/vect/pr84711.c: Add -msse for i686 targets. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr84711.c >>From gcc-bugs-return-609328-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 06 10:56:04 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10107 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2018 10:56:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10047 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jul 2018 10:55:59 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/86417] [9 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 Content-length: 952 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86417 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > The idea of the warning is to ensure that we have > Location information everywhere, and that patches > Which do not correctly set the location should cause > something visible during testing. We do not have this for > release. Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense. Do you have any idea what might have caused the regression? > We should take care to always regression test libgomp.fortran > as well... Yes, I finally got into this habit, after repeatedly breaking libgomp tests with my patches without noticing it. I also tried to document how to do this at the bottom of this wiki page: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/TestCaseWriting It took me a while to figure out how to actually run the Fortran subset of = the libgomp suite (which is not very well documented, or I'm too stupid to find it). >>From gcc-bugs-return-609329-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 06 11:10:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13054 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2018 11:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9746 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2018 11:10:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=shark, Hx-languages-length:1052 X-HELO: mout.gmx.net Received: from mout.gmx.net (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.18) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:10:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.241] ([89.78.252.225]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaqqY-1fqAMJ04gE-00KP82; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:10:13 +0200 Subject: Re: [Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org References: <471e8255-162f-4cdd-45bc-274271cfe973@arm.com> From: Kamil Rytarowski Message-ID: <11bdfd68-ac9b-fd06-81b1-df39b5dae66d@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <471e8255-162f-4cdd-45bc-274271cfe973@arm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DPIsYBf0KjAOKoIVEjTLIhkE17YxYLjpB" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --DPIsYBf0KjAOKoIVEjTLIhkE17YxYLjpB Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="aZXviM8QUDNqSmU1G6BSFsXRqRyvwHq1l"; protected-headers="v1" From: Kamil Rytarowski To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <11bdfd68-ac9b-fd06-81b1-df39b5dae66d@gmx.com> Subject: Re: [Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests References: <471e8255-162f-4cdd-45bc-274271cfe973@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <471e8255-162f-4cdd-45bc-274271cfe973@arm.com> --aZXviM8QUDNqSmU1G6BSFsXRqRyvwHq1l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 978 On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> On 04.07.2018 20:55, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86383 >>> >>> --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- >>> I'm not sure how relevant the netbsd-elf port is these days. I believe= they've >>> now moved onto an EABI based ABI. But no GCC port of that has been >>> contributed. >>> >> >> NetBSD switched on newer ARM CPUs to EABI and keeps compat with OABI. A >> user is free to build either EABI and OABI for ARMv4+ CPUs. Older pre >> ARMv4 CPUs use OABI only. >> >=20 > GCC-9 will drop support for pre-armv4 CPUs. Such support has been > marked as deprecated for about 3 years now. >=20 We verify these ports on real hardware. NetBSD/shark is prepared to be switched to Clang/LLVM as GCC is obsoleting it and surprisingly LLVM soon might have support for a wider range of ARM CPUs. --aZXviM8QUDNqSmU1G6BSFsXRqRyvwHq1l-- --DPIsYBf0KjAOKoIVEjTLIhkE17YxYLjpB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 850 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJABAEBCAAqFiEELaxVpweEzw+lMDwuS7MI6bAudmwFAls/TnkMHG41NEBnbXgu Y29tAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZs8dQP/354pV57LSXIfbux5sAmcmdycNXijxoWL+VyutwX CarOa46sg0lrjTD05mo0cf62m1g2gyWLedyFSPHdWaqYP/0A/4N2ipsiCfeqAcmF OlwlwRZNqwOD8eOFYOOGjqs+z/AaI04esGlkW7x7N8NgmCEurPd9YtPmp2e4LIdJ km14+3KH+dj5EKtsrZ/Qg9HjQ8klV2RHE8/JMGerI8Af3pZyXTzMLwn/rq+VRdzu u3/TIEytXFDDJaGhgmZxsJnxTnIOb2HkXNnAgJnlth1lY/9fUwqDjQC05cSmWIZb gp10Rsnv/YfZI5J7StjFC6P8NwvhipNhsP6Ce1Dcqd031YD2yG/hFnrGJxY8r8ZS XoE+i7l6Op/khczGYUYhlGt2tZkGWTb+RWJNznnKjxmHzPnBCITvPXn3NsdvUq2I SDURKzxmPC4RU0/F1i8/AVD7SddJhyVeTSTQu+EeDeMJ31I7cXy2hNCX7S5PN7V6 2U93vO55ug3slS/1TV5imbaZfJ9fp70pAS60JhNf3ctYkFQpEX8QvlWjdqXPrn4N oOlwfTLoBGnzm829ZBU5ig3rUnf/n3xy1rZo4LFuXW+z5gKXRAJ9TxbUB61TdQkS hhL0sRUePBIeOnVaGXSytG/P/No40+IrGpQk1SeZEjBEixgZxz+gM/6j2qQ9hBo2 eFJJ =yKdd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DPIsYBf0KjAOKoIVEjTLIhkE17YxYLjpB--