public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/86439] CTAD with deleted copy constructor fails due to deduction-guide taking by value Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:25:33 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-86439-4-CYbSctEH2x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-86439-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86439 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3eecc1db4c691a87ef4a229d059aa863066d9a1c commit r12-1744-g3eecc1db4c691a87ef4a229d059aa863066d9a1c Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> Date: Wed Jun 23 08:24:34 2021 -0400 c++: CTAD and deduction guide selection [PR86439] During CTAD, we select the best viable deduction guide using build_new_function_call, which performs overload resolution on the set of candidate guides and then forms a call to the guide. As the PR points out, this latter step is unnecessary and occasionally incorrect since a call to the selected guide may be ill-formed, or forming the call may have side effects such as prematurely deducing the type of a {}. So this patch introduces a specialized subroutine based on build_new_function_call that stops short of building a call to the selected function, and makes do_class_deduction use this subroutine instead. And since a call is no longer built, do_class_deduction doesn't need to set tf_decltype or cp_unevaluated_operand anymore. This change causes us to reject some container CTAD examples in the libstdc++ testsuite due to deduction failure for {}, which AFAICT is the correct behavior. Previously in e.g. the first removed example std::map{{std::pair{1, 2.0}, {2, 3.0}, {3, 4.0}}, {}}, the type of the {} would get deduced to less<int> as a side effect of forming a call to the chosen guide template<typename _Key, typename _Tp, typename _Compare = less<_Key>, typename _Allocator = allocator<pair<const _Key, _Tp>>> map(initializer_list<pair<_Key, _Tp>>, _Compare = _Compare(), _Allocator = _Allocator()) -> map<_Key, _Tp, _Compare, _Allocator>; which made later overload resolution for the constructor call unambiguous. Now, the type of the {} remains undeduced until constructor overload resolution, and we complain about ambiguity for the two equally good constructor candidates map(initializer_list<value_type>, const _Compare& = _Compare(), const allocator_type& = allocator_type()) map(initializer_list<value_type>, const allocator_type&). This patch fixes these problematic container CTAD examples by giving the {} an appropriate concrete type. Two of these adjusted CTAD examples (one for std::set and one for std::multiset) end up triggering an unrelated CTAD bug on trunk, PR101174, so these two adjusted examples are commented out for now. PR c++/86439 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.c (print_error_for_call_failure): Constify 'args' parameter. (perform_dguide_overload_resolution): Define. * cp-tree.h: (perform_dguide_overload_resolution): Declare. * pt.c (do_class_deduction): Use perform_dguide_overload_resolution instead of build_new_function_call. Don't use tf_decltype or set cp_unevaluated_operand. Remove unnecessary NULL_TREE tests. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * testsuite/23_containers/map/cons/deduction.cc: Replace ambiguous CTAD examples. * testsuite/23_containers/multimap/cons/deduction.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/23_containers/multiset/cons/deduction.cc: Likewise. Mention one of the replaced examples is broken due to PR101174. * testsuite/23_containers/set/cons/deduction.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/cons/deduction.cc: Replace ambiguous CTAD examples. * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multimap/cons/deduction.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multiset/cons/deduction.cc: Likewise. * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/deduction.cc: Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction88.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction89.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction90.C: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 12:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-86439-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-06-21 12:56 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-22 14:25 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-23 12:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-07-09 19:34 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-01 14:13 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-86439-4-CYbSctEH2x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).