From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E7B173851C2F; Sat, 9 May 2020 17:00:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E7B173851C2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589043640; bh=sq74m21HVWl2INL+2/lFVv6ma4gwqpN52UlicF1jPn0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M8UMBOmHFeBYJW1UdeoNJOVTSAgBFjCt08KoeIulQQPkkc6Zuo1qi4PHTU+9pl/OU txGUaIiA6oD84e3wCycK/MlLQlRhjIJquILpkH4tn6F8nP/AE1CZN0WB5YfWhleTua xR/Wn5COIrJE1yjOD3qWjlowL+54dpYaLjWStuxQ= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/86826] deduction fails on auto-returning function template Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 17:00:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cc cf_known_to_fail bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 17:00:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86826 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail| |11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-09 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- Confirmed. Not a regression, and still fails on trunk.=