* [Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable
[not found] <bug-87448-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-01-25 8:37 ` mscfd at gmx dot net
2023-11-01 18:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mscfd at gmx dot net @ 2022-01-25 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
--- Comment #3 from martin <mscfd at gmx dot net> ---
With gfortran-12, the ICE is gone, but the produced error message does not look
right.
mod.f90:12:25:
12 | associate(l => len(cs))
| 1
Error: Symbol ‘l’ at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable
[not found] <bug-87448-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-01-25 8:37 ` [Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable mscfd at gmx dot net
@ 2023-11-01 18:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-17 17:49 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-18 6:59 ` paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-11-01 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 56484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56484&action=edit
Fix for this PR
Somehow this missed being a blocker for the ASSOCIATE meta-bug.
The patch is so unbelievably simple that I am going to think about it for 24
hours, even though it regtests just fine :-)
module mod
implicit none
public
contains
function fun(cs) result(rs)
character(len=:), allocatable :: rs
character(len=*), intent(in) :: cs
associate(l => len(cs))
allocate(character(len=1+l) :: rs)
write (rs, '(i5)') l
end associate
end function fun
end module mod
use mod
character(:), allocatable :: res
res = fun("abcd")
if (res /= ' 4') stop 1
end
Gives the expected result.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable
[not found] <bug-87448-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-01-25 8:37 ` [Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable mscfd at gmx dot net
2023-11-01 18:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-17 17:49 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-18 6:59 ` paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-12-17 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> Created attachment 56484 [details]
> Fix for this PR
>
> Somehow this missed being a blocker for the ASSOCIATE meta-bug.
>
> The patch is so unbelievably simple that I am going to think about it for 24
> hours, even though it regtests just fine :-)
And it is so simple that you seem to have forgotten about it...
Are you going to pursue it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable
[not found] <bug-87448-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-17 17:49 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-18 6:59 ` paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com @ 2023-12-18 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> ---
Hi Harald,
I had forgotten about this PR because the fix became incorporated in the
patch for PR89645. In consequence, pr87448.f90 disappeared from the pr87477
failures :-)
One of the last tasks before submitting the fix-up patch for PR89645 was to
remove this chunk because I couldn't understand why it was there.
Thanks for the reminder.
Paul
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 17:49, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
>
> --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 56484 [details]
> > Fix for this PR
> >
> > Somehow this missed being a blocker for the ASSOCIATE meta-bug.
> >
> > The patch is so unbelievably simple that I am going to think about it
> for 24
> > hours, even though it regtests just fine :-)
>
> And it is so simple that you seem to have forgotten about it...
>
> Are you going to pursue it?
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread