From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1815A3858C50; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:53:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1815A3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674665596;
	bh=BzX3mZfhb61Np9TLCVP6blRjRdcJHwKXs7iNHdSan1o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OAXJ5cY9MTnj2q5okR4flSywZel/MMrWkl+/OoHUHPSxNnF60ly1shv2ySy1/qUlH
	 D8nzuG5z5FvYBGJasT9qMx8xeDpXR0T07QmnlP813WK5BfXyCyy30LWupKumRL5ai+
	 KGWSNmOvS+UPZiIKnIp/QqKJ8aZqByp8NWtpZSJw=
From: "coyorkdow at outlook dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvODc1MTJdIEVycm9yOiB0aGUgdHlwZSDigJhjb25z?=
 =?UTF-8?B?dCBhdXRv4oCZIG9mIOKAmGNvbnN0ZXhwcuKAmSB2YXJpYWJsZSBpcyBub3Qg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?bGl0ZXJhbA==?=
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:53:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: coyorkdow at outlook dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-87512-4-EN2M3Ow7Hj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-87512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-87512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D87512

--- Comment #7 from Guo Youtao <coyorkdow at outlook dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Guo Youtao from comment #5)
> > This bug can still be triggered in gcc-11 and gcc-12.
>=20
> That is unrelated bug. Most likely an issue with pointer to member functi=
ons
> which is might have some known issues too.

Should I open a new topic for this bug since this is unrelated?=