From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ED8093858D32; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:33:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED8093858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666031595; bh=aJJ67liOheqXCEVvqMSMFJ7qSo69UQfhPk2yEiP7Unk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=shsU259dpcjQrf2AkZSFb+BnOhd+tVIbcTmiQNjjFxsrpRz1T8yuTOPHWA9rafFfC UJRp2JM3X7OhKIzGjNe5JpdfIeQLte1bsURqaLEURTvTBwBj+0ehZthGjPC/X7G2Y/ zHx4Hri0hwvuPxEh2sqgTair9vPCybT7HD5hLF2I= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/87659] Memory corruption in array component of intent(in) unlimited polymorphic with optimization Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:33:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail bug_status cf_known_to_work Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D87659 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |10.2.1, 11.3.0, 7.5.0, | |8.5.0, 9.5.0 Status|NEW |WAITING Known to work| |10.4.1, 11.3.1, 12.2.1, | |13.0 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Adding several known-to-work/known-to-fail versions. Possibly fixed by one of Jose's patches that was recently committed and backported down to 10. (Could it be a dup of pr100132?)=