public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal
[not found] <bug-87847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-12 16:48 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-13 13:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-12 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=94454
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I posted a patch to enable sanitization for the spec_hasher tables for GCC 11
here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545525.html
With current trunk I wasn't able to reproduce any sanitization errors in the
testsuite or in other libraries even with a debugging patch similar to Martin's
(on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu). I suspect they have been fixed by the patches for
PR94454.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal
[not found] <bug-87847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-12 16:48 ` [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-13 13:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-19 3:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 14:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-13 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #11)
> I posted a patch to enable sanitization for the spec_hasher tables for GCC
> 11 here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545525.html
>
> With current trunk I wasn't able to reproduce any sanitization errors in the
> testsuite or in other libraries even with a debugging patch similar to
> Martin's (on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu). I suspect they have been fixed by the
> patches for PR94454.
Cool! Thank you Patrick for working on that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal
[not found] <bug-87847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-12 16:48 ` [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-13 13:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-19 3:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 14:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-19 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573e5f0500968dcf4025b8fc0ae5fb367f9c70d9
commit r11-477-g573e5f0500968dcf4025b8fc0ae5fb367f9c70d9
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Mon May 18 23:50:32 2020 -0400
c++: Enable spec_hasher table sanitization [PR87847]
It looks like hash table sanitization is now safe to enable for the
decl_specializations and type_specializations tables, probably ever
since PR94454 was fixed.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/87847
* pt.c (init_template_processing): Enable sanitization for
decl_specializations and type_specializations.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal
[not found] <bug-87847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-19 3:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-26 14:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-26 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 11.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-26 14:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-87847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-12 16:48 ` [Bug c++/87847] spec_hasher::hash does not match with spec_hasher::equal ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-13 13:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-19 3:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-26 14:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).