From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4CC92386191F; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:00:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CC92386191F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595343607;
 bh=5tzPm9PUaddBxljUlL1IR76Vqz6q1vbwzlCV8UyDGwY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=f8Agz5FhiXJoyrMMg3srBLWkYXI/uhTyjdyWyLv6oURl2C2XKRVSpGNtSjY4tOnnV
 J25nAotjEmXAw/0Tqip4fo9ycYC/jTPpZjXNotAdvFv6g7+HZkR51KDg3le6EnyPgT
 N8bONE06h879zb4ayVReF594rzAGBN6t3YhlVThY=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:00:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-88080-4-Shmmu8ZOf2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:00:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88080

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> IMO it is a coding policy. If one want to enforce implicit none, (s)he us=
es=20
> -fimplicit-none.
>=20
> I am in favor to close this PR as WONTFIX.

+1=