public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing
       [not found] <bug-88080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-07-21 12:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2020-07-21 15:00 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-25  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-21 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-07-21
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
IMO it is a coding policy. If one want to enforce implicit none, (s)he uses 
-fimplicit-none.

I am in favor to close this PR as WONTFIX.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing
       [not found] <bug-88080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-07-21 12:17 ` [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2020-07-21 15:00 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-25  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-21 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> IMO it is a coding policy. If one want to enforce implicit none, (s)he uses 
> -fimplicit-none.
> 
> I am in favor to close this PR as WONTFIX.

+1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing
       [not found] <bug-88080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-07-21 12:17 ` [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2020-07-21 15:00 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-25  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-25  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
No positive feedback. Closing as WONTFIX.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-25  9:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-88080-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-21 12:17 ` [Bug fortran/88080] Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-21 15:00 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-25  9:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).