From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D645E3858C55; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 01:47:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D645E3858C55 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712108874; bh=KqJfDWvHok1Z1LwvW5azYF16OW6nhr9N1oIrCeu7JF0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G+2Z/KR08yG+lfpglVjesivXcoC1k0DBWQJuEqnOgz67Ji4d7Jyv1h0TS3x1BRRU6 F5cpH54YQdVdQnjosekwCCv6zsBil0HcnDb91VVYDir37CgvH339+PULCRyFkOgXIr UJEY0UQzAMLo3BGRELBPaCX0w9kz8++MjDnYSlU4= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/88309] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception (in is_miss_rate_acceptable), target assigning alignent of 4 bits(!) to vector Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 01:47:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88309 Kewen Lin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #4) > > Hi Andrew, thanks for digging into this! William has not worked on GCC > > project any more, will you make a patch for this? >=20 > I don't have time to test it really. No problem, I'll work on this.=