From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 8760E398603D; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:52:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8760E398603D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1599821552;
 bh=zjnSIuZufIv27TGH9qqjTMUFskLzO88XuAy3B7OyDC8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=BLLWhycDq382hUHWgPq1QpMHUExc70GC3Vk2s34OcGR6eESQJRENTeZ41+oy+uR+R
 viSxXwh2OvZLUh68mzScqIBQQlXyESV/CeaJd+isMyUltC27jMht/VieOP3IaxfKgi
 k8f8V7BzxxvzwF2bqaZXb0vM5PC0bXpCmGPj4eDI=
From: "koen.zandberg at inria dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/88345] -Os overrides -falign-functions=N on the
 command line
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:52:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: koen.zandberg at inria dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-88345-4-Y4ag2wTB88@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88345-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88345-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:52:32 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88345

Koen Zandberg <koen.zandberg at inria dot fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |koen.zandberg at inria dot=
 fr

--- Comment #6 from Koen Zandberg <koen.zandberg at inria dot fr> ---
We're hitting this bug on the an ARMv7 (cortex-m7) platform. Due to cache
alignment we see a significant increase in performance when aligning indivi=
dual
functions on cache line boundaries, but we still prefer to compile with size
optimizations enabled due to the limited resources available on the platfor=
m.

Is there a way to work around this issue and enable -falign-functions toget=
her
with -Os?=