From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A2F323830B59; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:16:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2F323830B59 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1717579006; bh=8FX6hSOVU35LpPkP5iIyZ6hSxJLdKXJVGXjsfdFTZCs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gFAEgMOIK7X2SjWuM1Ppi5fiJCpCemB29pyKqMMTBZO16QNa+b8slGZhyamv7UPuW 8U3ZP8v4x2TzMXSozAXQA8BPoT0dXcZ0GGLGiMyN2Pm0rZTSp1mHhWtfIx3y2r+2cV Tx/q2QOZbTXHftyxB9X7kYvKLKG2dLkRwEy9QFlA= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/88545] std::find compile to memchr in trivial random access cases (patch) Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 09:16:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88545 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, but it's only a missed-optimization bug so there are much higher priorities.=