* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-07 12:15 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2020-05-07 12:49 ` wcventure at 126 dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in @ 2020-05-07 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trupti_pardeshi@persistent.
| |co.in
--- Comment #7 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> ---
Hi,
May I know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in which version?
Any heads up will be appreciated.
Best Regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 12:15 ` [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
@ 2020-05-07 12:49 ` wcventure at 126 dot com
2020-06-12 5:14 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: wcventure at 126 dot com @ 2020-05-07 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
--- Comment #8 from Cheng Wen <wcventure at 126 dot com> ---
(In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #7)
> commit ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f
> Author: GDB Administrator <gdbadmin@sourceware.org>
> Date: Wed Dec 19 00:00:21 2018 +0000
>
> Automatic date update in version.in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 12:15 ` [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2020-05-07 12:49 ` wcventure at 126 dot com
@ 2020-06-12 5:14 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2020-06-14 11:41 ` wcventure at 126 dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in @ 2020-06-12 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
--- Comment #9 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> ---
Hi,
Didn't understand reply given comment#8.
Please, may I know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in which
version?
Or this will be closed as Not reproduced as per comment#6.
Any heads up will be appreciated.
Best Regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-12 5:14 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
@ 2020-06-14 11:41 ` wcventure at 126 dot com
2020-06-15 7:54 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: wcventure at 126 dot com @ 2020-06-14 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
--- Comment #10 from Cheng Wen <wcventure at 126 dot com> ---
(In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
This bug can be reproduced in the commit version
ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f.
But now is fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-14 11:41 ` wcventure at 126 dot com
@ 2020-06-15 7:54 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2021-01-12 7:44 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-01-12 11:23 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in @ 2020-06-15 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
--- Comment #11 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> ---
(In reply to Cheng Wen from comment #10)
> (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
>
> This bug can be reproduced in the commit version
> ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f.
>
> But now is fixed.
Thanks for reply Cheng. But could you please help me to know, the version of
binutils and version of gcc having the fix of this issue?
Knowing fixed-in version (of binutils and gcc) will be very helpful.
Looking forward for reply.
Many Thanks,
Trupti
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-15 7:54 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
@ 2021-01-12 7:44 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-01-12 11:23 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: prajwapa at in dot ibm.com @ 2021-01-12 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
prajwapa at in dot ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
--- Comment #12 from prajwapa at in dot ibm.com ---
Could someone please let me know, in which binutils version is this fixed?(In
reply to Cheng Wen from comment #10)
> (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
>
> This bug can be reproduced in the commit version
> ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f.
>
> But now is fixed.
Could you please let me know, in which binutils version is this fixed?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt
[not found] <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-12 7:44 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
@ 2021-01-12 11:23 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-12 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to prajwapa from comment #12)
> Could you please let me know, in which binutils version is this fixed?
Not really. I can confirm that the test cases do not fail when tested with
binutils 2.35 (with sanitization enabled) and with any binutils all the way
back to 2.30 if sanitization is not enabled.
Given that the bug was reported in 2018-12 and assuming that it was fixed at
some point in the 6 months after that, then the nearest binutils release that
would have included the fix is 2.33.
I hope that this helps.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread