From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A714C383F85C; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:15:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A714C383F85C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588853736; bh=m7UQX+72FM1dzJCB7LKqoejTTF3ikq4zQ2ctyp0X+g4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZRX097ab+h7AzoxUXVQG3FkKlM5MFrv807y/jwa+FsIKKMbEfmP9aHTpr9LJsChzd miJy7Qgtmh0c/DocqxfIPfGrvkR75qJAjtzVWLEJbwn/s44RwWy9lBm1bAHmRBM9Lf MRUcT1BNX3TAdZoHotprkzJlWYXOFEC0G3vbkpqg= From: "trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 12:15:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: demangler X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 12:15:36 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88629 Trupti Pardeshi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trupti_pardeshi@persistent. | |co.in --- Comment #7 from Trupti Pardeshi --- Hi, May I know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in which versi= on?=20 Any heads up will be appreciated. Best Regards,=