From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 023063890412; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:23:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 023063890412
From: "nickc at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow
 problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by
 c++filt
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:23:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: demangler
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-88629-4-qllm9N9hf6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:23:42 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88629

Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nickc at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to prajwapa from comment #12)

> Could you please let me know, in which binutils version is this fixed?

Not really.  I can confirm that the test cases do not fail when tested with
binutils 2.35 (with sanitization enabled) and with any binutils all the way
back to 2.30 if sanitization is not enabled.

Given that the bug was reported in 2018-12 and assuming that it was fixed at
some point in the 6 months after that, then the nearest binutils release th=
at
would have included the fix is 2.33.

I hope that this helps.

Cheers
  Nick=