From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 35085386F447; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:54:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 35085386F447
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1592207657;
 bh=xwSWcMl2gNvCfs/MRp+SO02X5K0nyM9TlMxsDWsXVCA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=GenEMaVFnyjmumkWDdO3Wb04Gcqh4voGNmdcS3B9NXRUOtSdsOSPHAFnv7pqiEE91
 Gi+fvK0vvXx6F5MRaCGNc/18e0LZSCHhhVY3Y5Lo3dBNPimwNyKTsLomkRNMP2uQlJ
 72pDcht/1Eg1Qf9w+3SxBC7ebnO5e9JxTniHFj8A=
From: "trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow
 problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by
 c++filt
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:54:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: demangler
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-88629-4-xqprkfYOoG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:54:17 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88629

--- Comment #11 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.=
in> ---
(In reply to Cheng Wen from comment #10)
> (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
>=20
> This bug can be reproduced in the commit version
> ebb8004a18a3808d7197762faf3c5aaeae82371f.
>=20
> But now is fixed.

Thanks for reply Cheng. But could you please help me to know, the version of
binutils and version of gcc having the fix of this issue?

Knowing fixed-in version (of binutils and gcc) will be very helpful.

Looking forward for reply.

Many Thanks,
Trupti=