public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm
[not found] <bug-88783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-07 12:17 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2021-01-12 7:42 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in @ 2020-05-07 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trupti_pardeshi@persistent.
| |co.in
--- Comment #6 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> ---
Hi,
May I know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in which version?
Any heads up will be appreciated.
Best Regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm
[not found] <bug-88783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 12:17 ` [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
@ 2021-01-12 7:42 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-01-13 8:56 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-02-24 4:30 ` siddhesh at gotplt dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: prajwapa at in dot ibm.com @ 2021-01-12 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
prajwapa at in dot ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
--- Comment #7 from prajwapa at in dot ibm.com ---
Kindly let me know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in which
version?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm
[not found] <bug-88783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 12:17 ` [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2021-01-12 7:42 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
@ 2021-01-13 8:56 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-02-24 4:30 ` siddhesh at gotplt dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: prajwapa at in dot ibm.com @ 2021-01-13 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
--- Comment #8 from prajwapa at in dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to prajwapa from comment #7)
> Kindly let me know, if this bug is going to be fixed in binutils and in
> which version?
could someone please provide an update as this is urgent.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm
[not found] <bug-88783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-13 8:56 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
@ 2021-02-24 4:30 ` siddhesh at gotplt dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: siddhesh at gotplt dot org @ 2021-02-24 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |siddhesh at gotplt dot org
--- Comment #9 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org> ---
gcc version of libiberty hasn't had this issue since the following change which
removed the potential overflow. The POC also appears fixed with binutils 2.35;
from code inspection it should be fixed in 2.32 and later. This ought to be
closed.
ommit 6c8120c5ff130e03d32ff15a8f0d0e703592a2af
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Sat Dec 22 19:06:34 2018 -0500
Remove support for demangling GCC 2.x era mangling schemes.
libiberty/
* cplus-dem.c: Remove cplus_mangle_opname, cplus_demangle_opname,
internal_cplus_demangle, and all subroutines.
(libiberty_demanglers): Remove entries for ancient GNU (pre-3.0),
Lucid, ARM, HP, and EDG demangling styles.
(cplus_demangle): Remove 'work' variable. Don't call
internal_cplus_demangle.
include/
* demangle.h: Remove support for ancient GNU (pre-3.0), Lucid,
ARM, HP, and EDG demangling styles.
From-SVN: r267363
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-24 4:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-88783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-07 12:17 ` [Bug demangler/88783] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered in nm trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2021-01-12 7:42 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-01-13 8:56 ` prajwapa at in dot ibm.com
2021-02-24 4:30 ` siddhesh at gotplt dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).