From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 465FA393BA6C; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 04:29:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 465FA393BA6C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668918563;
	bh=/Eo98vfnOnCCa27nPlKA3KHji6egEftbLjsDcZbGz/M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TFcLMq9qHY92BTF/gP/zXWInMaX9pbCxkgq2Gv2dwkosoPl8+kSq9/HgAStDLjk2Y
	 KUrN85DiE0mISD93MQVGWaraIMyOkSe8oB7+hemsTgTxPstxv71xa0980utAHqYqZw
	 5rXhKiVEz1WE/tKDWpznbT3SV3vPu/8t0qm2/02g=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/88897] [10/11/12 Regression] Bogus
 maybe-uninitialized warning on class field (missed CSE)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 04:29:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-88897-4-pcP7x10JIR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88897-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88897-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88897

Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at gcc dot gnu.org
            Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]    |[10/11/12 Regression] Bogus
                   |Bogus maybe-uninitialized   |maybe-uninitialized warning
                   |warning on class field      |on class field (missed CSE)
                   |(missed CSE)                |

--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We're catching the previously missed CSE opportunity in fre1 now, and (of
course) we no longer get the bogus warning.  Removing the 13 regression mar=
ker.
 Finding and backporting the specific change seems like it's not worth it, =
but
leaving open with the other regression markers for now.=