public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:18:05 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-89074-4-73cl5yt9yi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-89074-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think this is another case of the same bug: constexpr bool test() { int a[] = { 1, 2 }; int b[] = { 3, 4 }; if (a+0 == b+0) // OK return false; if (a+1 == b+0) // ERROR return false; return true; } static_assert( test() ); g++ -std=c++20 ce.C -c ce.C:16:20: error: non-constant condition for static assertion 16 | static_assert( test() ); | ~~~~^~ ce.C:16:20: in 'constexpr' expansion of 'test()' ce.C:10:11: error: '((((int*)(& a)) + 4) == ((int*)(& b)))' is not a constant expression 10 | if (a+1 == b+0) // ERROR | ~~~~^~~~~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-18 14:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-89074-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-07-27 9:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-18 14:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-11-18 16:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 16:38 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 16:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 17:07 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 19:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 19:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 22:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 22:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-06 20:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-08 8:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-14 11:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-19 8:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-06 10:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-07 16:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-07 14:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-89074-4-73cl5yt9yi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).