public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-18 5:07 ` xerofoify at gmail dot com
2020-03-18 5:31 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: xerofoify at gmail dot com @ 2020-03-18 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail dot com> ---
PR84508 does not seem to be reproducible on trunk now as last commented by
Arseny on trunk. Not sure about backporting a fix but does not seem to happen
on trunk for now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-18 5:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482 xerofoify at gmail dot com
@ 2020-03-18 5:31 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2020-03-18 5:44 ` xerofoify at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2020-03-18 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com> ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #5)
> PR84508 does not seem to be reproducible on trunk now as last commented by
> Arseny on trunk. Not sure about backporting a fix but does not seem to
> happen on trunk for now.
PR85408, you mean. Sure, but why post it here? It is PR89116, not PR85408. The
latter is tracked in PR90040 by the modulo scheduler maintainer, and he's
perfectly aware of that. But one generally cannot simply close random PRs they
seemingly cannot reproduce anymore (and it seems you even didn't try to
reproduce it yourself), well-established GCC development process doesn't work
that way, and the whole issue w/ the modulo scheduler is not so trivial anyway,
so all those PRs are there for a reason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-18 5:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482 xerofoify at gmail dot com
2020-03-18 5:31 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2020-03-18 5:44 ` xerofoify at gmail dot com
2021-05-14 9:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: xerofoify at gmail dot com @ 2020-03-18 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
--- Comment #7 from Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #6)
> (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #5)
> > PR84508 does not seem to be reproducible on trunk now as last commented by
> > Arseny on trunk. Not sure about backporting a fix but does not seem to
> > happen on trunk for now.
>
> PR85408, you mean. Sure, but why post it here? It is PR89116, not PR85408.
> The latter is tracked in PR90040 by the modulo scheduler maintainer, and
> he's perfectly aware of that. But one generally cannot simply close random
> PRs they seemingly cannot reproduce anymore (and it seems you even didn't
> try to reproduce it yourself), well-established GCC development process
> doesn't work that way, and the whole issue w/ the modulo scheduler is not so
> trivial anyway, so all those PRs are there for a reason.
Sorry I see it now that this does block 90040 so it makes more sense now. My
mistake as I thought this was just a duplicate and not a set of bugs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-18 5:44 ` xerofoify at gmail dot com
@ 2021-05-14 9:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-89116-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-18 5:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482 xerofoify at gmail dot com
2020-03-18 5:31 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2020-03-18 5:44 ` xerofoify at gmail dot com
2021-05-14 9:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).