public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm
       [not found] <bug-89394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-05-06  8:22 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
  2020-05-06 10:55 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-05-07 12:11 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in @ 2020-05-06  8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394

Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |trupti_pardeshi@persistent.
                   |                            |co.in

--- Comment #9 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> ---
May I know, in which version of binutils this fix is available?

Any heads up will be appreciated.

Best Regards,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm
       [not found] <bug-89394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-05-06  8:22 ` [Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
@ 2020-05-06 10:55 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-05-07 12:11 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-06 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394

--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
> May I know, in which version of binutils this fix is available?

2.35.  Which should be available in August, all being well.

Cheers
  Nick

PS.  The fix is already in the mainline development code, so you can always
clone the repository and build your own toolchain.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm
       [not found] <bug-89394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-05-06  8:22 ` [Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
  2020-05-06 10:55 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-07 12:11 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in @ 2020-05-07 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394

--- Comment #11 from Trupti Pardeshi <trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10)
> (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
> > May I know, in which version of binutils this fix is available?
> 
> 2.35.  Which should be available in August, all being well.
> 
> Cheers
>   Nick
> 
> PS.  The fix is already in the mainline development code, so you can always
> clone the repository and build your own toolchain.

Thank you so much Nick for reply. We rely on binutils released version which
will have fixes against CVEs. So, needed to confirm.

Thanks you so much.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-07 12:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-89394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-05-06  8:22 ` [Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
2020-05-06 10:55 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-07 12:11 ` trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).