* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-07-05 19:42 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-09 20:55 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-05 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Two slightly reduced testcase variants that ICE with current master:
% cat pr89574-red1.f90
module mod
contains
subroutine init
end subroutine
end module mod
module init
use mod, only : test_init => init
implicit none
contains
subroutine sub
call test_init
end subroutine sub
end module
% cat pr89574-red2.f90
module mod
contains
integer function init ()
init = 0
end function
end module mod
module init
use mod, only : test_init => init
implicit none
contains
subroutine test_sub
print *, test_init ()
end subroutine test_sub
end module
Since changing "module init" to "module init1" avoid the issue in all
cases, this lookslike a namespace / symbol issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-05 19:42 ` [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-09 20:55 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-14 21:09 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-09 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
> Since changing "module init" to "module init1" avoid the issue in all
> cases, this lookslike a namespace / symbol issue.
I spent some time debugging this, and I am really confused now.
For reasons I do not understand, we end up in gfc_get_extern_function_decl,
2095 gsym = gfc_find_gsymbol (gfc_gsym_root, sym->name);
where we do not distinguish between the module that contains test_sub,
and the renamed-on-use subroutine from module mod.
Shouldn't we have entered mangled names in the tree that is pointed to by
gfc_gsym_root, instead of the unmangled ones?
Only if the name is of the bind-c type we have to use the "raw" name.
What am I missing?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-05 19:42 ` [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-09 20:55 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-14 21:09 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-14 21:21 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-14 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Line 2095 should never return a match for a symbol from a different module.
I have a patch that regtests cleanly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-14 21:09 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-14 21:21 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-21 19:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-14 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-July/054744.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-14 21:21 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-21 19:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-21 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c
commit r11-2256-g28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Tue Jul 21 21:37:30 2020 +0200
PR fortran/89574 - ICE in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
When checking for an external procedure from the same file, do not
consider symbols from different modules.
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/89574
* trans-decl.c (gfc_get_extern_function_decl): Check whether a
symbol belongs to a different module.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-21 19:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 19:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
<anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab0c51af90f475dab8f1b306737cd04b06d4b04
commit r10-8523-gbab0c51af90f475dab8f1b306737cd04b06d4b04
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Tue Jul 21 21:37:30 2020 +0200
PR fortran/89574 - ICE in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
When checking for an external procedure from the same file, do not
consider symbols from different modules.
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/89574
* trans-decl.c (gfc_get_extern_function_decl): Check whether a
symbol belongs to a different module.
(cherry picked from commit 28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 19:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 20:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 20:04 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
<anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2fe9b1bf79037a90bc5146efe77417b888a86a0
commit r9-8762-gb2fe9b1bf79037a90bc5146efe77417b888a86a0
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Tue Jul 21 21:37:30 2020 +0200
PR fortran/89574 - ICE in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
When checking for an external procedure from the same file, do not
consider symbols from different modules.
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/89574
* trans-decl.c (gfc_get_extern_function_decl): Check whether a
symbol belongs to a different module.
(cherry picked from commit 28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 19:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 20:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 20:04 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
<anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41c072bded24642d6b4a38e3f5e2890c1aa8c5a1
commit r8-10372-g41c072bded24642d6b4a38e3f5e2890c1aa8c5a1
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Tue Jul 21 21:37:30 2020 +0200
PR fortran/89574 - ICE in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
When checking for an external procedure from the same file, do not
consider symbols from different modules.
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/89574
* trans-decl.c (gfc_get_extern_function_decl): Check whether a
symbol belongs to a different module.
(cherry picked from commit 28f2a080cc27531a8c78aec9f44aeff4961c2a4c)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792
[not found] <bug-89574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-23 20:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-23 20:04 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on all open branches.
Thanks for the report!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread