From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9A5943857020; Fri,  2 Jun 2023 08:10:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9A5943857020
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685693413;
	bh=rMjqxvo/oVt/4bAvLrzcPQHIvGOemfsel/GxP/9kG+Y=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jIZzqcCEvRcoWslYfWtNdp+IM4qCSORcKdxdFlxhzEjuSybGRRTjN3EaDZ6+tPKx6
	 fvMdV91mFKQvX1BLAFM0pm5RQ11+GWoI9soqXFVj/YzX+OZ0W5zIk0XHY+vjra8y5e
	 LMPeiGuulmTYoTzcfnXlUleP+X7xMVQp69K9MFFg=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X =>
 function() )
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:10:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-89645-4-H2ncyTJk6Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-89645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D89645

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Ian,

This is one of two PRs (cf. 99065) that expose a really nasty fault with
gfortran parsing. If you interchange 's' and 'fun', you will find that the
testcase compiles and runs.

The fixup for intrinsic types works fine but, unfortunately, the derived ty=
pe
is need for parsing the associate block itself.

I am girding my loins to fight the good fight.

Thanks for this posting.

Paul=