public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-06-02 10:36 ` manfred99 at gmx dot ch
2020-06-21 11:39 ` manfred99 at gmx dot ch
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manfred99 at gmx dot ch @ 2020-06-02 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
Manfred Schwarb <manfred99 at gmx dot ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manfred99 at gmx dot ch
--- Comment #4 from Manfred Schwarb <manfred99 at gmx dot ch> ---
I see it too on i686 for current trunk: Instrumenting the testsuite checks with
/usr/bin/env LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1 MALLOC_PERTURB_=B MALLOC_CHECK_=3 make check
9 | class(t2), pointer :: q(2) ! { dg-error "must have a deferred
shape" }
| 1
Error: Pointer array component of structure at (1) must have a deferred shape
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x8e61e8d crash_signal
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:328
0x860f511 resolve_component
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:14318
0x86107fb resolve_fl_derived0
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:14753
0x8610d29 resolve_fl_derived
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:14882
0x8611ad0 resolve_symbol
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:15251
0x8636a81 do_traverse_symtree
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:4150
0x8636b18 gfc_traverse_ns(gfc_namespace*, void (*)(gfc_symbol*))
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:4175
0x8615988 resolve_types
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:17175
0x8615dd8 gfc_resolve(gfc_namespace*)
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:17290
0x85eb469 resolve_all_program_units
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.c:6245
0x85ebb66 gfc_parse_file()
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.c:6492
0x864043d gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:210
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
With valgrind, the following analysis is shown:
==72395== Invalid read of size 4
==72395== at 0x860F4C3: resolve_component(gfc_component*, gfc_symbol*)
(resolve.c:14304)
==72395== by 0x86107FB: resolve_fl_derived0(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.c:14753)
==72395== by 0x8610D29: resolve_fl_derived(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.c:14882)
==72395== by 0x8611AD0: resolve_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (resolve.c:15251)
==72395== by 0x8636A81: do_traverse_symtree(gfc_symtree*, void
(*)(gfc_symtree*), void (*)(gfc_symbol*)) (symbol.c:4150)
==72395== by 0x8636B18: gfc_traverse_ns(gfc_namespace*, void
(*)(gfc_symbol*)) (symbol.c:4175)
==72395== by 0x8615988: resolve_types(gfc_namespace*) (resolve.c:17175)
==72395== by 0x8615DD8: gfc_resolve(gfc_namespace*) (resolve.c:17290)
==72395== by 0x85EB469: resolve_all_program_units(gfc_namespace*)
(parse.c:6245)
==72395== by 0x85EBB66: gfc_parse_file() (parse.c:6492)
==72395== by 0x864043D: gfc_be_parse_file() (f95-lang.c:210)
==72395== by 0x8E62281: compile_file() (toplev.c:458)
==72395== Address 0x46e99e4 is 116 bytes inside a block of size 204 free'd
==72395== at 0x4031B37: free (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==72395== by 0x8635090: gfc_free_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (symbol.c:3096)
==72395== by 0x863515D: gfc_release_symbol(gfc_symbol*) (symbol.c:3123)
==72395== by 0x8635FCA: gfc_restore_last_undo_checkpoint() (symbol.c:3700)
==72395== by 0x863606B: gfc_undo_symbols() (symbol.c:3731)
==72395== by 0x85E60B0: reject_statement() (parse.c:2633)
==72395== by 0x85DE291: match_word(char const*, match (*)(), locus*)
(parse.c:70)
==72395== by 0x85DEE43: decode_statement() (parse.c:376)
==72395== by 0x85E4A6F: next_free() (parse.c:1279)
==72395== by 0x85E500C: next_statement() (parse.c:1511)
==72395== by 0x85E7256: parse_derived() (parse.c:3342)
==72395== by 0x85E7F06: parse_spec(gfc_statement) (parse.c:3883)
==72395== Block was alloc'd at
==72395== at 0x4032CC6: calloc (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==72395== by 0x9F4F125: xcalloc (xmalloc.c:162)
==72395== by 0x863517D: gfc_new_symbol(char const*, gfc_namespace*)
(symbol.c:3134)
==72395== by 0x86356A0: gfc_get_sym_tree(char const*, gfc_namespace*,
gfc_symtree**, bool) (symbol.c:3368)
==72395== by 0x863584F: gfc_get_symbol(char const*, gfc_namespace*,
gfc_symbol**) (symbol.c:3421)
==72395== by 0x855E4D3: gfc_match_decl_type_spec(gfc_typespec*, int)
(decl.c:4494)
==72395== by 0x8560A37: gfc_match_data_decl() (decl.c:6119)
==72395== by 0x85DE270: match_word(char const*, match (*)(), locus*)
(parse.c:65)
==72395== by 0x85DEE43: decode_statement() (parse.c:376)
==72395== by 0x85E4A6F: next_free() (parse.c:1279)
==72395== by 0x85E500C: next_statement() (parse.c:1511)
==72395== by 0x85E7256: parse_derived() (parse.c:3342)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-02 10:36 ` [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error) manfred99 at gmx dot ch
@ 2020-06-21 11:39 ` manfred99 at gmx dot ch
2020-06-21 17:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manfred99 at gmx dot ch @ 2020-06-21 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
--- Comment #5 from Manfred Schwarb <manfred99 at gmx dot ch> ---
This might have been solved by
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=ac932bfcd21e9523fa2b880ae8138aef79da7f54
, at least I don't
see it anymore in today's build. As the crash of class_61.f90 is a bit
difficult
to reproduce, additional confirmation might be needed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-02 10:36 ` [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error) manfred99 at gmx dot ch
2020-06-21 11:39 ` manfred99 at gmx dot ch
@ 2020-06-21 17:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-11-05 9:17 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-06-21 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Not seen in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-June/564061.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-21 17:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2020-11-05 9:17 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 21:40 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 19:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-05 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see it again rather frequently since a couple of days ago. (cross x86_64 ->
arm)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 9:17 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 21:40 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 19:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See also PR78746, comment#17. A patch was submitted there to solve this issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-05 21:40 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-07 19:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-07 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue found with valgrind should be fixed, see PR78746. Closing.
Thanks for the report!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-07 19:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-89661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-02 10:36 ` [Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error) manfred99 at gmx dot ch
2020-06-21 11:39 ` manfred99 at gmx dot ch
2020-06-21 17:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-11-05 9:17 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 21:40 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 19:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).