From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 09FA13858C30; Fri,  3 Feb 2023 20:03:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 09FA13858C30
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675454589;
	bh=Wsh/a2V4pSlkHVrlq6htGp6oXTbqj5IZI6+pDUa44W0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WgcWE2qpDhj1RY1TRovPzgoRJ0ORhO7dC5FeFUzYoLqw5+OMc6scSc2u9r0AN0gS8
	 yMWPxDc3+MhLUqOw03uxTgyFDgnnXylvoYPbLUk8dIVnCdiddlc2S6dS/98d78Gp1y
	 aVw9PFd/fr8V/YTP4BY3rfCbCqlOKEHLFNgROSoo=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/89925] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong array bounds from
 ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:03:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-89925-4-m5bJl6pLgT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-89925-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-89925-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D89925

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #10)
> I think that could be the commit
> r12-5767-g6262e3a22b3d86afc116480bc59a7bb30b0cfd40
> "fortran: Fix setting of array lower bound for named arrays"
>=20
> but I have not checked more deeply.

I can confirm that your patch in r12-5767-yada-yada
fixed this bug.  Your patch included two testcases.
Do you think that Neil's code should be converted to
a new testcase or do your testcases cover this issue.

Neil, sorry it took so long to get a fix.=