From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B72543858C50; Wed,  5 Oct 2022 09:09:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B72543858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664960959;
	bh=nQjx1C8L66wkkCnaQJdPDHrzsdGsyhG5Q46FkBIypek=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QIEScmKqyJb6xFoJQB2ZI0HuNKKIBt+UH/PvucV31J3Y4iRB2sKSC7GNC3myZYYLV
	 H8fEVRl++VtRFAjtpBa7s5uvGksMHYQSUFn6VCjDNUX0e6YZsa/npqbBCIsKshj5rr
	 DtoD3Do0Zk5PfiQVP7w8C53C2XTTgqkYxWCzU4vE=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/89997] Garbled expression in error message with -fconcepts
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 09:09:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-89997-4-ZEuLQQYBwJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-89997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-89997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D89997

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Is this good enoug now?

I'm going to assume the answer's yes.=